<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Colorado Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coloradoresearch.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coloradoresearch.com</link>
	<description>Enterprise Software - Architecture - Development - Leadership - Management - Diversion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:34:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So Much to Learn, So Little Time to Know&#8230; by Karen at HelpMyOldDog.com</title>
		<link>http://www.coloradoresearch.com/archives/269/comment-page-1#comment-22579</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen at HelpMyOldDog.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coloradoresearch.com/?p=269#comment-22579</guid>
		<description>Hi Jon,

It&#039;s interested to see you have a WordPress blog. I recently moved my &quot;hobby website&quot;, www.HelpMyOldDog., to a WordPress blog. Actually, it has not &quot;gone live&quot; in WordPress yet.... but will within the next few weeks. I really appreciated hearing about iTunesU. I&#039;ve done one podcast and will definitely research using iTunes for distribution of that and possibly other podcasts in the future.

Thanks for sharing the info you share on this website!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jon,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interested to see you have a WordPress blog. I recently moved my &#8220;hobby website&#8221;, <a href="http://www.HelpMyOldDog." rel="nofollow">http://www.HelpMyOldDog.</a>, to a WordPress blog. Actually, it has not &#8220;gone live&#8221; in WordPress yet&#8230;. but will within the next few weeks. I really appreciated hearing about iTunesU. I&#8217;ve done one podcast and will definitely research using iTunes for distribution of that and possibly other podcasts in the future.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing the info you share on this website!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are You a Leader?  If so, How? by Seek First to Understand &#171; Colorado Research by Jon Ford</title>
		<link>http://www.coloradoresearch.com/archives/201/comment-page-1#comment-22318</link>
		<dc:creator>Seek First to Understand &#171; Colorado Research by Jon Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 14:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coloradoresearch.com/?p=201#comment-22318</guid>
		<description>[...] problem solving and organization have dominated my extracurricular thinking.   My last posts on how you lead and diversity in problem solving emerged from my observations during recent meetings as well as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] problem solving and organization have dominated my extracurricular thinking.   My last posts on how you lead and diversity in problem solving emerged from my observations during recent meetings as well as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Last Lecture by james</title>
		<link>http://www.coloradoresearch.com/archives/109/comment-page-1#comment-21497</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 17:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coloradoresearch.com/archives/109#comment-21497</guid>
		<description>Love the video, watched it several times. Had to have the book. Both are things everyone should do. Watch the video. Read the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the video, watched it several times. Had to have the book. Both are things everyone should do. Watch the video. Read the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s all about Standards &#8211; Leopard gets UNIX certification by Thomas Magee</title>
		<link>http://www.coloradoresearch.com/archives/87/comment-page-1#comment-21193</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Magee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 03:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coloradoresearch.com/archives/87#comment-21193</guid>
		<description>Looks like it&#039;s on its way.

http://landonf.bikemonkey.org/code/macosx/MacOS_Java_16_Developer_Preview_1.20071120.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like it&#8217;s on its way.</p>
<p><a href="http://landonf.bikemonkey.org/code/macosx/MacOS_Java_16_Developer_Preview_1.20071120.html" rel="nofollow">http://landonf.bikemonkey.org/code/macosx/MacOS_Java_16_Developer_Preview_1.20071120.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Never Constrain Excellence with Average by Thomas Magee</title>
		<link>http://www.coloradoresearch.com/archives/90/comment-page-1#comment-21192</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Magee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 03:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coloradoresearch.com/archives/90#comment-21192</guid>
		<description>Jon,

That&#039;s a very interesting insight.  I think it may well apply to more than just programming, as I&#039;m sure you suspect.  It makes the challenge of managing for &quot;fairness&quot; kind of insane, or at least &quot;crazy making&quot;.  I guess I kind of aim for a minimum standard of performance and then try not to constrain the uber performers.  It&#039;s hard to do because the creative thinkers sometimes only perform on average in one type of work and then rock in a bunch of others.  Meanwhile the other average performers look at the one doing all the other things and think, &quot;Hey!  How come they get to do all that other stuff?&quot;  The answer is, &quot;Because they want to.&quot;  

I love the line about not being &quot;limited by the collective average&quot;.

Regards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a very interesting insight.  I think it may well apply to more than just programming, as I&#8217;m sure you suspect.  It makes the challenge of managing for &#8220;fairness&#8221; kind of insane, or at least &#8220;crazy making&#8221;.  I guess I kind of aim for a minimum standard of performance and then try not to constrain the uber performers.  It&#8217;s hard to do because the creative thinkers sometimes only perform on average in one type of work and then rock in a bunch of others.  Meanwhile the other average performers look at the one doing all the other things and think, &#8220;Hey!  How come they get to do all that other stuff?&#8221;  The answer is, &#8220;Because they want to.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I love the line about not being &#8220;limited by the collective average&#8221;.</p>
<p>Regards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SOA is Just an Example of High Cohesion and Loose Coupling by Mountain Man</title>
		<link>http://www.coloradoresearch.com/archives/9/comment-page-1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Mountain Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 15:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coloradoresearch.com/archives/9#comment-4</guid>
		<description>There is definitely overhead to an SOA deployment with XML based messaging.  Our overhead is ~30ms per message, including time to parse XML and route through the ESB for synchronous messaging (request - reply.)  But, my current environment is not very high volume or real-time.  If you can&#039;t stand a 5ms delay, stick with native JMS (or whatever your standard is) and just apply the same principles - canonical message formats can be specified in Java, C++, CORBA IDL, etc.  Good Luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is definitely overhead to an SOA deployment with XML based messaging.  Our overhead is ~30ms per message, including time to parse XML and route through the ESB for synchronous messaging (request &#8211; reply.)  But, my current environment is not very high volume or real-time.  If you can&#8217;t stand a 5ms delay, stick with native JMS (or whatever your standard is) and just apply the same principles &#8211; canonical message formats can be specified in Java, C++, CORBA IDL, etc.  Good Luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SOA is Just an Example of High Cohesion and Loose Coupling by Libor</title>
		<link>http://www.coloradoresearch.com/archives/9/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Libor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coloradoresearch.com/archives/9#comment-3</guid>
		<description>As you are probably quite experience in SOA I&#039;m would like to know what is communication overhead if you are using XML (i.e. how many messages you are able to process per second on one service). Do you know those statistics?

I&#039;m interested this info because we are using SOA in our electronic trading application as well but no XML/SOAP due very poor processing speed (at the best we are able to execute simplest SOAP message within 5ms). This leads to limit our application for access from 3rd party only those who have libs from us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you are probably quite experience in SOA I&#8217;m would like to know what is communication overhead if you are using XML (i.e. how many messages you are able to process per second on one service). Do you know those statistics?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested this info because we are using SOA in our electronic trading application as well but no XML/SOAP due very poor processing speed (at the best we are able to execute simplest SOAP message within 5ms). This leads to limit our application for access from 3rd party only those who have libs from us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

